Radioactivity, Nuclear Physics and its Medical Applications

123 Tunneling

Learning Objectives

  • Define quantum tunneling and explain why it is a uniquely quantum mechanical phenomenon.
  • Describe the concept of a potential energy barrier and explain why it prevents classical particles from escaping.
  • Explain how quantum tunneling accounts for alpha decay and other important physical phenomena.

One of the most remarkable predictions of quantum mechanics is that particles can sometimes pass through energy barriers that they do not have enough energy to overcome according to classical physics. This phenomenon, known as quantum tunneling, has no classical counterpart and plays an essential role in nuclear physics, semiconductor electronics, and many modern technologies.

To understand the basic idea, imagine placing a marble inside a smooth bowl, as shown in Figure 123.1. The marble can roll freely within the bowl, but unless it gains enough energy to climb over the rim, it remains trapped indefinitely. According to classical physics, the marble can never escape unless additional energy is supplied.

A marble rolls inside a bowl located at the top of a hill. The marble reaches a maximum height below the rim because it does not have enough energy to escape. A tunnel through the side of the hill illustrates an alternative path that would allow the marble to leave the bowl.
Figure 123.1: A marble trapped inside a bowl cannot escape unless it acquires enough energy to climb over the rim. Quantum tunneling provides an analogy in which a particle can pass through an energy barrier instead of going over it.

Atomic nuclei behave similarly. Protons and neutrons are bound inside the nucleus by the attractive strong nuclear force. Removing one of these particles requires energy because it is trapped within a region of low potential energy. On average, nucleons are bound by approximately 8 MeV per nucleon.

Figure 123.2 shows a simplified potential energy diagram for an alpha particle inside a nucleus. The attractive nuclear force creates a deep potential well that confines the particle. Outside the nucleus, the positively charged alpha particle experiences the repulsive Coulomb force from the remaining protons, producing a potential energy barrier. Classically, the alpha particle does not possess enough kinetic energy to overcome this barrier, so it should remain trapped inside the nucleus forever.

Simplified potential energy diagram for an alpha particle inside a nucleus. The attractive nuclear force forms a deep potential well, while the repulsive Coulomb force creates a potential barrier outside the nucleus.
Figure 123.2: The strong nuclear force confines nucleons within a potential well. Outside the nucleus, the Coulomb force creates a potential barrier that an alpha particle cannot overcome using classical mechanics alone.

Yet alpha decay clearly occurs. Radioactive nuclei spontaneously emit alpha particles even though those particles appear to lack sufficient energy to escape. The explanation comes from quantum mechanics.

In quantum theory, particles are described by wave functions rather than by precise trajectories. Instead of being confined to a single location, a particle has a probability of being found at different positions in space. When the wave function reaches a potential energy barrier, it does not stop abruptly. Instead, it extends into the barrier while decreasing exponentially.

Because the wave function remains nonzero inside the barrier, there is a small—but finite—probability that the particle can be found on the opposite side. When this occurs, the particle is said to have tunneled through the barrier. This process is called quantum tunneling or barrier penetration.

Wave function of a quantum particle approaching a potential barrier. The wave function decreases exponentially inside the barrier and continues with a smaller amplitude beyond it, indicating a finite probability of transmission.
Figure 123.3: A quantum particle is described by a wave function that extends smoothly through a potential energy barrier. Although the wave function decreases exponentially inside the barrier, it remains nonzero beyond it, giving the particle a finite probability of tunneling through the barrier.

The idea that quantum tunneling explains alpha decay was first developed in the late 1920s by George Gamow and independently by Ronald Gurney and Edward Condon. Their work successfully explained both why alpha decay occurs and why different radioactive nuclei have dramatically different half-lives.

The theory predicts that the probability of tunneling depends very strongly on the thickness and height of the potential barrier. If an alpha particle has slightly more energy, it begins closer to the top of the barrier, making the barrier effectively thinner. The wave function then decreases less rapidly inside the barrier, increasing the probability that the particle will tunnel through. As a result, nuclei that emit higher-energy alpha particles generally have much shorter half-lives than nuclei that emit lower-energy alpha particles. Remarkably, this simple quantum model accurately explains alpha-decay half-lives spanning more than 17 orders of magnitude.

Quantum Tunneling Beyond Nuclear Physics

Quantum tunneling is not limited to radioactive decay. The same phenomenon occurs whenever quantum particles encounter sufficiently thin potential barriers. Electrons, for example, can tunnel between two conducting objects separated by an extremely small gap, even though they lack the classical energy required to cross it.

One important application is the scanning tunneling microscope (STM). In an STM, a sharp conducting probe is brought within a few atomic diameters of a sample surface. Electrons tunnel between the probe and the sample, producing a tiny electric current. Because the tunneling probability changes exponentially with the width of the gap, even an atomic-scale change in surface height produces a measurable change in current. By scanning the probe across the surface while monitoring this current, the microscope can generate images that resolve individual atoms.

(a) Diagram of a scanning tunneling microscope showing electrons tunneling between a sharp probe and a sample surface. (b) Electron microscope image showing fine surface details of an insect.
Figure 123.4: (a) A scanning tunneling microscope detects extremely small variations in surface height by measuring the tunneling current between a conducting probe and a sample. (b) High-resolution imaging reveals microscopic structures that are inaccessible to ordinary optical microscopes. (Credit: Louisa Howard, Dartmouth College)

Physics in Healthcare

Quantum tunneling has important medical applications. Alpha-emitting isotopes used in targeted alpha therapy rely on quantum tunneling to escape the nucleus before destroying nearby cancer cells. Tunneling also underlies many semiconductor devices used in medical equipment, including radiation detectors, imaging electronics, and integrated circuits found in modern diagnostic instruments. Scanning tunneling microscopes are widely used in biomedical and materials research to investigate surfaces at nearly atomic resolution.

Interactive Exploration: Quantum Tunneling and Wave Packets

According to classical physics, a particle cannot pass through a potential energy barrier unless it has enough energy to climb over it. Quantum mechanics predicts a very different outcome. Because particles are described by wave functions, there is a finite probability that a particle can be found on the opposite side of a barrier even when its energy is lower than the barrier height. This phenomenon is known as quantum tunneling.

In this interactive simulation, you will investigate how wave packets behave when they encounter potential energy barriers. By changing the barrier's height and width, you can observe how these properties influence the probability that a particle tunnels through instead of being reflected.

Figure 123.X. Explore how quantum wave packets interact with potential energy barriers and observe how barrier height and width affect the probability of quantum tunneling using the PhET Quantum Tunneling and Wave Packets simulation.

Guided Exploration

As you work through the simulation, consider the following questions:

  1. Launch a wave packet toward a potential energy barrier. What happens when it reaches the barrier? Is the wave packet completely reflected, completely transmitted, or partially both?
  2. Increase the height of the barrier while keeping all other variables constant. How does the probability of tunneling change?
  3. Return the barrier to its original height and increase its width. How does increasing the barrier thickness affect the transmitted wave packet?
  4. Compare situations in which the particle energy is less than, approximately equal to, and greater than the barrier height. How do the reflected and transmitted portions of the wave packet differ in each case?
  5. Observe the wave function inside the barrier. Why does its amplitude decrease exponentially rather than dropping immediately to zero?
  6. Compare the quantum prediction with the classical prediction. Why would classical physics expect a different outcome when the particle's energy is less than the barrier height?
  7. Based on your observations, explain why quantum tunneling is essential for phenomena such as alpha decay, scanning tunneling microscopy, semiconductor devices, and certain types of radioactive medical treatments.

After completing the exploration, compare your observations with the concepts presented in this chapter. Quantum particles are described by wave functions that extend into—and sometimes through—potential energy barriers. Although the probability of transmission may be very small, it is not zero. This finite probability allows particles to tunnel through barriers that would be impossible to cross according to classical mechanics. The same quantum phenomenon explains alpha decay in radioactive nuclei and enables many modern technologies, from scanning tunneling microscopes to advanced semiconductor electronics.

Section Summary

  • Quantum tunneling is a uniquely quantum mechanical phenomenon in which a particle has a finite probability of passing through a potential energy barrier even when it does not possess enough energy to overcome the barrier according to classical physics.
  • A potential energy barrier confines particles in many physical systems, including atomic nuclei. Classically, a particle whose energy is less than the barrier height cannot escape.
  • Quantum particles are described by wave functions that extend into a potential barrier. Because the wave function decreases exponentially rather than ending abruptly, there is a nonzero probability of finding the particle on the opposite side of the barrier.
  • Quantum tunneling explains alpha decay, allowing alpha particles to escape atomic nuclei despite having insufficient classical energy to overcome the Coulomb barrier.
  • The probability of tunneling depends strongly on the height and width of the barrier. Higher-energy alpha particles encounter an effectively thinner barrier, resulting in a greater tunneling probability and shorter radioactive half-lives.
  • Quantum tunneling is fundamental to many modern technologies, including scanning tunneling microscopes, semiconductor devices, tunnel diodes, and certain medical imaging and radiation therapy technologies.

Conceptual Questions

  1. A physics student who has violated several conservation laws is imprisoned and hopes to escape by quantum tunneling through the cell wall. Explain why the probability of this occurring is essentially zero, even though quantum tunneling is possible in principle.
  2. When an atomic nucleus undergoes alpha decay, does the alpha particle travel continuously through every point between the inside and the outside of the nucleus? Explain your answer using the quantum mechanical description of tunneling.

Problems

  1. Use the data in Table 123.1 to derive an approximate relationship between the alpha-decay energy and the radioactive half-life of a nucleus.Hint: Plot [latex]\log(t_{1/2})[/latex] versus [latex]E_{\alpha}[/latex] and determine whether the data follow an approximately straight-line relationship.
    Table 123.1. Alpha-Decay Energy and Half-Life
    Nuclide [latex]E_{\alpha}[/latex] (MeV) [latex]t_{1/2}[/latex]
    [latex]{}^{216}\mathrm{Ra}[/latex] 9.5 0.18 μs
    [latex]{}^{194}\mathrm{Po}[/latex] 7.0 0.7 s
    [latex]{}^{240}\mathrm{Cm}[/latex] 6.4 27 d
    [latex]{}^{226}\mathrm{Ra}[/latex] 4.91 1600 y
    [latex]{}^{232}\mathrm{Th}[/latex] 4.1 [latex]1.4\times10^{10}[/latex] y
  2. Integrated Concepts. A 2.00-T magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the path of charged particles in a bubble chamber. Determine the radius of curvature of the path of a 10.0-MeV proton. Neglect any loss of energy as the proton travels through the chamber.
    1. Write the nuclear equation for the alpha decay of [latex]{}^{235}\mathrm{U}[/latex].
    2. Calculate the energy released during the decay. The mass of the daughter nucleus is 231.036298 u.
    3. Assuming the daughter nucleus remains in its ground state, determine how much of the released energy becomes the kinetic energy of the emitted alpha particle.
  3. Unreasonable Results. The naturally occurring isotope [latex]{}^{48}\mathrm{Ca}[/latex] has a half-life of approximately [latex]2\times10^{16}~\mathrm{y}[/latex].
    1. A sample is labeled as having an activity of 1.0 Ci. What mass of [latex]{}^{48}\mathrm{Ca}[/latex] does the sample contain?
    2. What is unreasonable about your result?
    3. Which assumption is responsible for the unreasonable result?
  4. Unreasonable Results. A physicist scatters gamma rays from a substance and concludes that its nucleus has a radius of [latex]7.5\times10^{-13}\ \mathrm{m}[/latex].
    1. Estimate the atomic mass number of such a nucleus.
    2. What is unreasonable about the result?
    3. What assumption is likely responsible for the unreasonable conclusion?
  5. Unreasonable Results. A theoretical physicist proposes that an isolated proton can spontaneously decay according to
    [latex]p \rightarrow n + e^+ + \nu_e,[/latex]

    claiming that all conservation laws are satisfied.

    1. Calculate the energy released by this proposed decay.
    2. What is unreasonable about the result?
    3. Which assumption leads to the contradiction?
  6. Construct Your Own Problem. Radioactive isotopes inside Earth continuously release energy that contributes to Earth's internal heat. Construct and solve a problem in which you estimate the activity of radioactive materials in one cubic meter of rock, calculate the thermal power generated, and estimate the average heat flow through Earth's surface if the generated power is emitted uniformly. Clearly state any assumptions you make regarding the activity, decay energy, and Earth's size.

Glossary

barrier penetration
A quantum mechanical process in which a particle has a finite probability of passing through a potential energy barrier despite having less energy than the barrier height. Also called quantum tunneling.
quantum mechanical tunneling
The quantum mechanical phenomenon in which a particle crosses a potential energy barrier that it cannot overcome according to classical mechanics because its wave function extends through the barrier. Also called barrier penetration.
tunneling
A quantum mechanical process in which the wave nature of matter allows particles to penetrate and sometimes pass through potential energy barriers that are classically forbidden.
definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Introductory Physics for the Health and Life Sciences II Copyright © 2012 by OSCRiceUniversity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.