Circuits and DC Instruments

31 Null Measurements

Learning Objectives

  • Explain why null measurement techniques are generally more accurate than conventional voltmeters and ammeters.
  • Describe how a Wheatstone bridge can be used to determine an unknown electrical resistance with high precision.

In the previous chapter, we learned that every voltmeter and ammeter changes the circuit it is measuring to some extent. A voltmeter draws a small current, while an ammeter adds a small resistance to the circuit. Although these effects are often negligible, they introduce measurement uncertainty.

Null measurements overcome this limitation by adjusting a circuit until no current flows through the measuring instrument. Because the instrument draws essentially no current at the balance point, it has virtually no effect on the circuit being measured. This makes null methods among the most accurate electrical measurement techniques.

Although null measurements are generally more precise than direct measurements with voltmeters or ammeters, they require more complex circuits and careful adjustment. In this section, we examine two classic examples: the potentiometer, used for measuring voltage (or emf), and the Wheatstone bridge, used for measuring resistance. Both devices demonstrate important circuit principles that continue to be used in modern electronic instrumentation and biomedical equipment.

The Potentiometer

Suppose you want to determine the emf of a battery as accurately as possible. A simple approach is to connect a voltmeter across the battery, as shown in Figure 31.1. However, as discussed in the previous chapter, the voltmeter measures the terminal voltage, not necessarily the emf.

The measured voltage is related to the battery's emf by

[latex]V=\text{emf}-Ir,[/latex]

where I is the current drawn from the battery and r is its internal resistance.

If the battery's internal resistance were known perfectly, the emf could be calculated from this equation. In practice, however, the internal resistance is often uncertain and may even change with temperature, age, or battery condition. The most accurate measurement would therefore occur if the current were zero, since then

[latex]V=\text{emf}.[/latex]

Unfortunately, ordinary voltmeters require a small current to operate, making a direct measurement impossible. A different approach is needed.

Comparison of a battery connected to an analog voltmeter and its equivalent circuit showing the galvanometer and series resistance inside the voltmeter. The meter draws a small current, so the measured voltage is the battery's terminal voltage rather than its true emf.
Figure 31.1: Connecting an analog voltmeter directly across a battery causes a small current to flow. As a result, the meter measures the battery's terminal voltage rather than its true emf. Because the battery's internal resistance is not known exactly, the emf cannot be determined with perfect accuracy using this method alone.

A potentiometer is a null measurement device designed specifically to measure voltage without drawing current from the source being measured. The basic idea is illustrated in Figure 31.2.

A separate voltage source drives a constant current through a long, uniform resistor (often a wire). Because the current remains constant, the voltage decreases uniformly along the length of the wire. By moving a sliding contact, any desired voltage can be selected.

An unknown emf, labeled [latex]{\text{emf}}_x[/latex], is connected in opposition to the voltage developed along the wire through a sensitive galvanometer. The contact point is adjusted until the galvanometer reads zero.

When the galvanometer indicates zero current, no current flows through the unknown battery. Therefore, its terminal voltage equals its emf, giving

[latex]{\text{emf}}_x=IR_x,[/latex]

where [latex]R_x[/latex] is the resistance of the wire segment between the starting point and the balance point.

Next, the unknown battery is replaced with a standard reference cell having a precisely known emf, [latex]{\text{emf}}_s[/latex]. The contact point is adjusted again until the galvanometer returns to zero, giving

[latex]{\text{emf}}_s=IR_s.[/latex]

Because the same current flows through the wire during both measurements, taking the ratio eliminates the unknown current:

[latex]\frac{{\text{emf}}_x}{{\text{emf}}_s}=\frac{{IR}_x}{{IR}_s}=\frac{R_x}{R_s}.[/latex]

Solving for the unknown emf gives

[latex]{\text{emf}}_x={\text{emf}}_s\frac{R_x}{R_s}.[/latex]
Diagram of a potentiometer. One circuit sends a constant current through a long resistor. A second circuit connects an unknown voltage source and a galvanometer to a movable contact on the resistor. The contact is adjusted until the galvanometer reads zero.
Figure 31.2: A potentiometer measures voltage by balancing an unknown emf against the voltage drop along a uniform resistor. (a) A constant current flows through the long resistor, creating a uniform voltage gradient. (b) The sliding contact is adjusted until the galvanometer detects no current. At this balance point, the unknown emf equals the voltage drop across the selected section of wire, allowing it to be determined by comparison with a known reference voltage.

Because the resistor is made from a uniform wire, its resistance is directly proportional to its length. Consequently, the resistance ratio [latex]R_x/R_s[/latex] can often be determined simply by measuring the corresponding wire lengths.

This method is considerably more accurate than measuring the voltage directly with a voltmeter because the unknown battery supplies essentially no current during the measurement. Nevertheless, the measurement is not perfect. Small uncertainties remain due to the precision of the reference voltage, the measurement of the wire lengths (or resistances), and the difficulty of determining the exact point where the galvanometer reads zero.

Modern digital instruments often achieve similar results electronically using very high input resistance or automatic null-balancing circuits. These techniques are widely used in laboratory instruments and in medical equipment that measures extremely small electrical signals, such as electrocardiographs (ECGs), electroencephalographs (EEGs), and precision biomedical sensors.

Resistance Measurements and the Wheatstone Bridge

Many instruments sold as ohmmeters appear to measure resistance directly. In reality, most simply apply a known voltage to the unknown resistor, measure the resulting current, and then calculate the resistance using Ohm's law.

Two common methods are illustrated in Figure 31.3. In one configuration, the source voltage is assumed to be known and the current is measured. In the other, both the voltage and current are measured to improve accuracy. Although these methods work well for many applications, they are limited because the voltmeter and ammeter themselves slightly change the circuit being measured.

Two methods of measuring electrical resistance. In the first circuit, a battery, resistor, and ammeter are connected in series. In the second circuit, a voltmeter is connected across the resistor while an ammeter measures the current.
Figure 31.3: Two common methods for measuring resistance using standard electrical meters. (a) If the source voltage is known, the resistance can be calculated from the measured current using Ohm's law. (b) Measuring both the voltage across the resistor and the current through it generally improves accuracy, but both instruments still slightly alter the circuit they are measuring.

A much more accurate method is the Wheatstone bridge, a classic example of a null measurement device. Rather than measuring current and voltage directly, the Wheatstone bridge compares an unknown resistance with known resistors and adjusts the circuit until no current flows through a sensitive galvanometer.

The bridge, shown in Figure 31.4, contains three known resistors and one unknown resistance, [latex]R_x[/latex]. The resistor [latex]R_3[/latex] is adjustable, allowing the circuit to be balanced.

When the galvanometer reads zero, no current flows through the bridge branch. At this balance point, points b and d are at the same electric potential. Because no current passes through the galvanometer, it does not affect the rest of the circuit, greatly improving measurement accuracy.

Under these balanced conditions, the voltage drops along corresponding sections of the two branches are equal. Therefore,

[latex]I_1R_1=I_2R_3.[/latex]

Similarly,

[latex]I_1R_2=I_2R_x.[/latex]

Dividing one equation by the other eliminates the unknown currents:

[latex]\frac{I_1R_1}{I_1R_2}=\frac{I_2R_3}{I_2R_x}.[/latex]

After canceling the currents and solving for the unknown resistance, we obtain the Wheatstone bridge equation:

[latex]R_x=R_3\frac{R_2}{R_1}.[/latex]

Circuit diagram of a Wheatstone bridge containing three known resistors, one unknown resistor, a galvanometer connected between the two bridge junctions, and a battery supplying the circuit. Figure 31.4: A Wheatstone bridge measures an unknown resistance by adjusting the variable resistor [latex]R_3[/latex] until the galvanometer reads zero. At this balance point, no current flows through the galvanometer, allowing the unknown resistance to be calculated accurately from the known resistor values.

One advantage of the Wheatstone bridge is that the measuring instrument does not draw current when the bridge is balanced. This eliminates one of the largest sources of measurement error found in conventional voltmeters and ammeters.

For this reason, Wheatstone bridges have been widely used in scientific laboratories and engineering for more than a century. Modern versions remain important in healthcare and biomedical engineering because many sensors—such as strain gauges, pressure transducers, and some temperature sensors—change their resistance in response to physical conditions. Wheatstone bridge circuits can detect these very small resistance changes with extremely high precision, making them useful in devices ranging from blood pressure monitors to electronic laboratory instruments.

Although highly accurate, the Wheatstone bridge is not perfect. Small uncertainties remain because the bridge cannot be balanced with absolute precision, and the known resistors themselves have manufacturing tolerances. Nevertheless, null measurement techniques such as the Wheatstone bridge routinely provide significantly greater accuracy than direct resistance measurements using ordinary meters.

Check Your Understanding

Identify other factors that might limit the accuracy of null measurements. Would using a digital detector that is more sensitive than a traditional galvanometer improve the accuracy of null measurements? Explain your reasoning.

Section Summary

  • Null measurement techniques improve measurement accuracy by adjusting a circuit until no current flows through the measuring instrument, minimizing the instrument's effect on the circuit.
  • A potentiometer is a null measurement device used to measure voltage (or emf) by comparing an unknown voltage with a precisely known reference voltage.
  • A Wheatstone bridge is a null measurement device used to determine an unknown electrical resistance by balancing two branches of a circuit.
  • The same principles of null measurements can be applied to many other physical quantities when they can be converted into small voltage or resistance changes, making these techniques valuable in scientific research, engineering, and biomedical instrumentation.

Conceptual Questions

  1. Why can a null measurement be more accurate than one using standard voltmeters and ammeters? What factors limit the accuracy of null measurements?
  2. If a potentiometer is used to measure cell emfs on the order of a few volts, why is it most accurate for the standard [latex]{\text{emf}}_{\text{s}}[/latex] to be the same order of magnitude and the resistances to be in the range of a few ohms?

Problems & Exercises

  1. What is the [latex]{\text{emf}}_{\text{x}}[/latex] of a cell being measured in a potentiometer, if the standard cell’s emf is 12.0 V and the potentiometer balances for [latex]{R}_{\text{x}}=5\text{.}000\phantom{\rule{0.15em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex] and [latex]{R}_{\text{s}}=2\text{.}500\phantom{\rule{0.15em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex]?
  2. Calculate the [latex]{\text{emf}}_{\text{x}}[/latex] of a dry cell for which a potentiometer is balanced when [latex]{R}_{\text{x}}=1\text{.}200\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex], while an alkaline standard cell with an emf of 1.600 V requires [latex]{R}_{\text{s}}=1\text{.}247\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex] to balance the potentiometer.
  3. When an unknown resistance [latex]{R}_{\text{x}}[/latex] is placed in a Wheatstone bridge, it is possible to balance the bridge by adjusting [latex]{R}_{3}[/latex] to be [latex]2500\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex]. What is [latex]{R}_{\text{x}}[/latex] if [latex]\frac{{R}_{2}}{{R}_{1}}=0.625[/latex]?
  4. To what value must you adjust [latex]{R}_{3}[/latex] to balance a Wheatstone bridge if the unknown resistance [latex]{R}_{\text{x}}[/latex] is [latex]100\phantom{\rule{0.15em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex], [latex]{R}_{1}[/latex] is [latex]50.0\phantom{\rule{0.15em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex], and [latex]{R}_{2}[/latex] is [latex]175\phantom{\rule{0.15em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex]?
  5. (a) What is the unknown [latex]{\text{emf}}_{\text{x}}[/latex] in a potentiometer that balances when [latex]{R}_{\text{x}}[/latex] is [latex]10.0\phantom{\rule{0.15em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex], and balances when [latex]{R}_{\text{s}}[/latex] is [latex]15.0\phantom{\rule{0.15em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex] for a standard 3.000-V emf? (b) The same [latex]{\text{emf}}_{\text{x}}[/latex] is placed in the same potentiometer, which now balances when [latex]{R}_{\text{s}}[/latex] is [latex]15.0\phantom{\rule{0.15em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex] for a standard emf of 3.100 V. At what resistance [latex]{R}_{\text{x}}[/latex] will the potentiometer balance?
  6. Suppose you want to measure resistances in the range from [latex]10.0\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\Omega[/latex] to [latex]10.0\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{k}\Omega[/latex] using a Wheatstone bridge that has [latex]\frac{{R}_{2}}{{R}_{1}}=2.000[/latex]. Over what range should [latex]{R}_{3}[/latex] be adjustable?

Glossary

null measurement
A measurement technique in which a circuit is adjusted until no current flows through the measuring instrument, minimizing the instrument's effect on the circuit and improving measurement accuracy.
potentiometer
A null measurement instrument used to determine an unknown voltage or electromotive force (emf) by comparing it with a precisely known reference voltage.
ohmmeter
An instrument that determines electrical resistance by applying a known voltage, measuring the resulting current, and calculating the resistance using Ohm's law.
bridge circuit
A circuit configuration that compares two branches of a network. Bridge circuits are commonly used for high-precision electrical measurements, including many null measurement techniques.
Wheatstone bridge
A bridge circuit that determines an unknown resistance by balancing two branches of the circuit until no current flows through a galvanometer or other sensitive detector.
definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Introductory Physics for the Health and Life Sciences II Copyright © 2012 by OSCRiceUniversity is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.