Electric Potential and Electric Field
16 Capacitors in Series and Parallel
Learning Objectives
- Derive expressions for total capacitance in series and in parallel.
- Identify series and parallel parts in the combination of connection of capacitors.
- Calculate the effective capacitance in series and parallel given individual capacitances.
Several capacitors may be connected together in a variety of applications. Multiple connections of capacitors act like a single equivalent capacitor. The total capacitance of this equivalent single capacitor depends both on the individual capacitors and how they are connected. There are two simple and common types of connections, called series and parallel, for which we can easily calculate the total capacitance. Certain more complicated connections can also be related to combinations of series and parallel.
Before working with equations, it helps to keep two physical ideas in mind. First, capacitance describes how much charge a device can store per volt, so a larger capacitance means “more charge for the same voltage.” Second, when you connect components, the constraints imposed by the wiring matter: in some connections the same charge must appear on each capacitor, while in other connections the same voltage must appear across each capacitor. Series connections enforce the “same charge” constraint; parallel connections enforce the “same voltage” constraint. Those two constraints are the reason the math turns out so differently in the two cases.
Capacitance in Series
Figure 16.1(a) shows a series connection of three capacitors with a voltage applied. As for any capacitor, the capacitance of the combination is related to charge and voltage by [latex]C=\frac{Q}{V}[/latex]. In a series connection, the capacitors are connected “end-to-end,” so there is only one path for charge to move. That single-path feature is what forces all series capacitors to share the same magnitude of charge.
Note in Figure 16.1 that opposite charges of magnitude [latex]Q[/latex] flow to either side of the originally uncharged combination of capacitors when the voltage [latex]V[/latex] is applied. Conservation of charge requires that equal-magnitude charges be created on the plates of the individual capacitors, since charge is only being separated in these originally neutral devices. To see why, imagine pushing a small amount of negative charge onto the leftmost outer plate. That charge cannot cross the insulating gap inside the first capacitor, so it forces an equal amount of negative charge to appear on the adjacent inner plate of that same capacitor. But that inner plate is physically connected by a wire to the next capacitor’s plate, so the “extra” negative charge cannot simply sit there without affecting the next capacitor. The only way the conductor can remain overall neutral (no net charge piling up in the wire segments between capacitors) is for charge separation to occur on each capacitor, producing the same magnitude [latex]Q[/latex] on every capacitor in the series chain. In other words, series wiring does not allow different capacitors to “take different charges”; the chain behaves like a single conduit for charge separation.
This charge constraint has an important geometric interpretation. Each capacitor stores charge by separating it across a gap. If you place capacitors in series, you are effectively placing multiple gaps one after another. The combination resembles a single capacitor with an effective plate separation greater than that of any individual capacitor alone. (See Figure 16.1(b).) Larger plate separation means smaller capacitance, because it is harder (for a given voltage) to pull large amounts of opposite charge onto plates that are effectively farther apart. That is why a series combination always has a total capacitance smaller than any single capacitor in the series.

We can find an expression for the total capacitance by considering the voltage across the individual capacitors shown in Figure 16.1. Start from the definition [latex]C=\frac{Q}{V}[/latex]. Solving for the voltage across a single capacitor gives [latex]V=\frac{Q}{C}[/latex]. In series, the magnitude of the charge on each capacitor is the same, so the voltages across the individual capacitors are
[latex]{V}_{1}=\frac{Q}{{C}_{1}}[/latex], [latex]{V}_{2}=\frac{Q}{{C}_{2}}[/latex], and [latex]{V}_{3}=\frac{Q}{{C}_{3}}[/latex]. The total voltage supplied by the source is the sum of the voltage drops across each capacitor (just as voltage drops add in series resistor circuits):
Now define the equivalent series capacitance [latex]{C}_{\text{S}}[/latex] as the capacitance of a single capacitor that would store the same charge [latex]Q[/latex] when connected to the same total voltage [latex]V[/latex]. By definition,
Because the total voltage is also the sum of the individual voltages, we can write
Substitute [latex]{V}_{1}=\frac{Q}{{C}_{1}}[/latex], [latex]{V}_{2}=\frac{Q}{{C}_{2}}[/latex], and [latex]{V}_{3}=\frac{Q}{{C}_{3}}[/latex]:
Canceling the common factor [latex]Q[/latex] (which is nonzero whenever the capacitors are charged) yields the key series formula:
The “...” indicates that this expression works for any number of capacitors in series. This form immediately explains why the series capacitance is always smaller than any individual capacitance. Adding positive terms on the right-hand side makes [latex]\frac{1}{C_{\text{S}}}[/latex] larger than [latex]\frac{1}{C_1}[/latex], [latex]\frac{1}{C_2}[/latex], etc., which forces [latex]C_{\text{S}}[/latex] to be smaller than each [latex]C_i[/latex]. Physically, placing capacitors in series increases the effective separation and therefore reduces the ability of the combination to store charge for a given applied voltage.
Total Capacitance in Series, [latex]{C}_{\text{s}}[/latex]
Total capacitance in series: [latex]\frac{1}{{C}_{\text{S}}}=\frac{1}{{C}_{1}}+\frac{1}{{C}_{2}}+\frac{1}{{C}_{3}}+\ldots[/latex]
Example 16.1: What Is the Series Capacitance?
Find the total capacitance for three capacitors connected in series, given their individual capacitances are 1.000, 5.000, and 8.000 [latex]\text{µF}[/latex].
Strategy
In series, the reciprocal of the total capacitance equals the sum of the reciprocals of the individual capacitances. Because the series formula uses reciprocals, it is often easiest to compute [latex]\frac{1}{C_{\text{S}}}[/latex] first and then invert at the end.
Solution
Using [latex]\frac{1}{{C}_{\text{S}}}=\frac{1}{{C}_{1}}+\frac{1}{{C}_{2}}+\frac{1}{{C}_{3}}[/latex], we substitute the given values:
Now invert to solve for [latex]{C}_{\text{S}}[/latex]:
Discussion
The total series capacitance [latex]{C}_{\text{S}}[/latex] is less than the smallest individual capacitance (1.000 [latex]\mu\text{F}[/latex]), illustrating a key fact about series connections: series combinations reduce capacitance. A useful arithmetic trick is to combine the fractions using a common denominator. Here, a convenient common denominator (in whole-number form) is 40:
so that
Either method leads to the same result. The important conceptual point is that in series the charge is the same on each capacitor, so the voltages divide among them. The smallest capacitor (smallest [latex]C[/latex]) receives the largest voltage because [latex]V=\frac{Q}{C}[/latex]. That voltage division is often why capacitors are placed in series in real circuits: it can allow a combination to tolerate a higher total voltage, because each capacitor “sees” only part of the total (though careful design is needed in practice to ensure the division is safe and stable).
Capacitors in Parallel
Figure 16.2(a) shows a parallel connection of three capacitors with a voltage applied. In a parallel connection, each capacitor is connected directly across the same two nodes of the circuit (the same two “rails” of potential). Because conductors are equipotentials, the potential difference between those two nodes is the same for every capacitor in the parallel group. Therefore, the voltage across each capacitor is the same, and it is equal to the source voltage [latex]V[/latex]. This “same voltage” constraint is the defining feature of a parallel connection.
If each capacitor has the same voltage, then each stores whatever charge it would store if it were connected alone to that same voltage. Using [latex]Q=\text{CV}[/latex], a capacitor with a larger capacitance stores more charge at the same [latex]V[/latex]. The total charge drawn from the source is simply the sum of the charges placed on the individual capacitors, because the source supplies charge into multiple branches:

To derive the parallel formula, write the total charge and individual charges using [latex]Q=\text{CV}[/latex]. The equivalent capacitor has [latex]Q={C}_{\text{p}}V[/latex]. Each individual capacitor has [latex]{Q}_{1}={C}_{1}V[/latex], [latex]{Q}_{2}={C}_{2}V[/latex], and [latex]{Q}_{3}={C}_{3}V[/latex]. Substitute these into [latex]Q={Q}_{1}+{Q}_{2}+{Q}_{3}[/latex]:
Cancel the common factor [latex]V[/latex] (which is the same across each branch in a parallel connection):
So total capacitance in parallel is simply the sum of the individual capacitances. This makes physical sense if you think in terms of geometry: connecting capacitors in parallel is like increasing the effective plate area, because the source can store charge on multiple sets of plates at the same voltage. Increasing plate area increases capacitance, which is why the equivalent capacitor in Figure 16.2(b) is drawn as having larger effective area.
Total Capacitance in Parallel, [latex]{C}_{\text{p}}[/latex]
Total capacitance in parallel: [latex]{C}_{\text{p}}={C}_{1}+{C}_{2}+{C}_{3}+\ldots[/latex]
More complicated connections of capacitors can sometimes be combinations of series and parallel. (See Figure 16.3.) To find the total capacitance of such combinations, we identify series and parallel parts, compute their equivalent capacitances step by step, and then combine those equivalents until the entire network reduces to one capacitance.

Example 16.2: A Mixture of Series and Parallel Capacitance
Find the total capacitance of the combination of capacitors shown in Figure 16.3. Assume the capacitances are known to three decimal places ([latex]{C}_{1}=1.000\ \mu\text{F}[/latex], [latex]{C}_{2}=5.000\ \mu\text{F}[/latex], and [latex]{C}_{3}=8.000\ \mu\text{F}[/latex]), and round your answer to three decimal places.
Strategy
Identify series and parallel groups by looking at which components share the same two nodes (parallel) and which are connected end-to-end with a single path between them (series). In Figure 16.3, capacitors [latex]{C}_{1}[/latex] and [latex]{C}_{2}[/latex] are in series, so we first replace them by their equivalent [latex]{C}_{\text{S}}[/latex]. Then [latex]{C}_{\text{S}}[/latex] is in parallel with [latex]{C}_{3}[/latex], so the total is the sum [latex]{C}_{\text{tot}}={C}_{\text{S}}+{C}_{3}[/latex].
Solution
Because [latex]{C}_{1}[/latex] and [latex]{C}_{2}[/latex] are in series, their equivalent satisfies
Invert to obtain the equivalent series capacitance:
Now [latex]{C}_{\text{S}}[/latex] is in parallel with [latex]{C}_{3}[/latex], so the total capacitance is the sum:
Discussion
This step-by-step reduction approach is the standard method for analyzing larger capacitor networks. At each step, you replace a portion of the circuit that is clearly series or clearly parallel with a single equivalent capacitor. Repeating this process simplifies the network until only one equivalent capacitance remains. Throughout, the physical constraints guide the math: series parts share the same charge and split the total voltage, while parallel parts share the same voltage and split the total charge.
Section Summary
- Total capacitance in series [latex]\frac{1}{{C}_{\text{S}}}=\frac{1}{{C}_{1}}+\frac{1}{{C}_{2}}+\frac{1}{{C}_{3}}+\text{.}\text{.}\text{.}[/latex]
- Total capacitance in parallel [latex]{C}_{\text{p}}={C}_{1}+{C}_{2}+{C}_{3}+\text{.}\text{.}\text{.}[/latex]
- If a circuit contains a combination of capacitors in series and parallel, identify series and parallel parts, compute their capacitances, and then find the total.
Conceptual Questions
- If you wish to store a large amount of energy in a capacitor bank, would you connect capacitors in series or parallel? Explain.
Problems & Exercises
-
- Find the total capacitance of the combination of capacitors in Figure 16.4.

Figure 16.4: A combination of series and parallel connections of capacitors. - Suppose you want a capacitor bank with a total capacitance of 0.750 F and you possess numerous 1.50 mF capacitors. What is the smallest number you could hook together to achieve your goal, and how would you connect them?
- What total capacitances can you make by connecting a [latex]5\text{.}\text{00 µF}[/latex] and an [latex]8\text{.}\text{00 µF}[/latex] capacitor together?
- Find the total capacitance of the combination of capacitors shown in Figure 16.5.

Figure 16.5: A combination of series and parallel connections of capacitors. - Find the total capacitance of the combination of capacitors shown in Figure 16.6.

Figure 16.6: A combination of series and parallel connections of capacitors. - Unreasonable Results
(a) An [latex]8\text{.}\text{00 µF}[/latex] capacitor is connected in parallel to another capacitor, producing a total capacitance of [latex]5\text{.}\text{00 µF}[/latex]. What is the capacitance of the second capacitor? (b) What is unreasonable about this result? (c) Which assumptions are unreasonable or inconsistent?
- Find the total capacitance of the combination of capacitors in Figure 16.4.